Case to go to Grand Jury,god willing...
D.Y.F.S.RUINED TWO LITTLE GIRL(s)life by withholding PHOTOS/POLICE FILE To secure a win........

do THESE little girls look abused in pix below,and throughout this organizational website involving the ILLEGAL REMOVAL/Kidnapping of these "once"sane healthy beautiful girls? do they"really look abused?"

of course not...but now?

THEIR LIFE IS REALLY ONE OF "ABUSE"IN THE MOST ABHORRENT WAY,ALL COURTESY OF A CORRUPT AGENCY WHO as you read on this informative site the story of RECENT/REAL FRAUD WITHIN THE DIVISION YOUTH FAMILY SERVICE(S)in union county

 

 

 

                                                  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS,TRAGICALLY FROM LESSONS"NOT LEARNED"from other new jersey/tri-state area tragedies involving the DIVISION now is happening AGAIN TO THE ADVOCATE TWO LITTLE GIRLS,as D.Y.F.S."if not for withheld/knowledge of the photos and other significant evidence IN THE D.Y.F.S. own files,email notes,investigation files,the mother children would have never been subjected to such imminent danger/harm,repeat hospital stays,since age 10 and 7,so read on america.Call if your case is similar,we thank you for your ONGOING Support.


DYFS "are not the POLICE"and even the POLICE KNOW THEIR"limits"as recently said in a interview for the mother who own this site,her t.v. documentary she is putting together in the name,the MEMORY of her NOW damaged little girls,once so pretty beautiful and so well mannered and"healthy and sane" the police are saying EVEN DYFS,At the time her girls were kidnapped/stolen during a weekend holiday visit,even DYFS IN UNION COUNTY knows the child was NOT HURT,WAS NOT SERIOUSLY INJURED,has NO BRUISES FROM METAL HANGER OBJECT on her,

because the POLICE actually was talking to dyfs"all files"reports recently are showing the family prompting the advocate/owner of this site,her many lawsuit(s)against ALL who clearly defrauded the system,to keep HER UN-INJURED little girls causing them to be subjected to hospital repeat visits,hospitalization,injuries in dyfs care and dyfs placement(JUDGE NEVER KNEW THIS EITHER)until MOTHER/ADVOCATE brought it to the COURT'S ATTENTION.

DYFS CLEARLY IS BEING ALLOWED TO DO TO NEW JERSEY MOST PRECIOUS Gift,the children and the innocent parent loving good nurturing good loving father and mothers who TRULY love their children as the evil that lurks in our backyard(s)our children school are those who are swearing UNDER OATH To"protect"the child and their names are D.Y.F.S.as evil is clearly the workers,supervisors who continually undermined our children SANITY/RIP APART families who are NOT IN NEED OF their government assistance,and this time,they've met the wrong parent.  

The United States Supreme Court found that such a restriction on the defendant's ability to cross-examine witnesses violated the Confrontation Clause,

despite the state's  interest in protecting the identity of juvenile offenders. Id. at 318-, 94 S.Ct.

The laws are CLEAR this judge asserts,they are to PROTECT us ALL from this kind of thing from taken place across the lands of our states.

The Confrontation Clause is implicated only when there is "a specific statutory or court-imposed restriction at trial on the scope of questioning." Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 54, 107 S.Ct. 989, 999, 94 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987).
 
"The right to confront is satisfied if defense counsel receives wide latitude at trial to cross-examine witnesses.


Supreme Court case "that concerns pretrial discovery of privileged information" i.e.
 Ritchie. In Ritchie,
 
the defendant was charged with sexual crimes against his daughter. 480 U.S. at 43, 107 S.Ct. at 994.
 
In the course of preparing his defense, the defendant served Children and Youth Services (CYS),
which had investigated the allegations, with a subpoena requesting access to the agency's file on his daughter's case. Id. 

CPS wrongfully had denied the defendant and his attorney access to the file,Moreover the defendant asserts he never even was aware his client has such a obscene amount of "favorable evidence"proving his client's "INNOCENCE"shocking the judicial conscience regarding attorney,judge(s)and all who work in the name of justice,this attorney assert
and the judge agreed with the defense legal arguement adding below:



THE COURT CORRECTLY FOUND THAT DEFENDANT CLAIMS WERE PROPERLY EVALUATED Under the "due process"clause of the 14th amendment Id. S.Ct. at 1001.
 
Under it's due process analysis the Court first noted the "well-settled" rule:

"that the government has the obligation to turn over evidence in its possession that is both favorable to the accused and material to guilt or punishment."
 Id. at 57, 107 S.Ct. at 1001.

"'Evidence is material is a REASONABLE Probability had all of the evidence has been turned over, the result of the proceeding would have been different.


 
A 'reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome regarding the state and favor the defendant being accused.

The Court also recognized the strong public interest in protecting the confidentiality of the CYS file and understands the public outcry

 if  material evidence was improperly and illegally withheld,during the time the accused is preparing for trial,in civil and criminal proceedings.


Thus, the Court determined that the defendant's interest in obtaining a fair trial and the commonwealth's interest in preserving the confidentiality of the CYS file could "be protected fully by requiring that the CYS files be submitted for trial if a new trial is pursued by the state. Id. at 60, 107 S.Ct. at 1102-03. 

Defendant attorney was bewildered at how cps in philadelphia,pa were able to withhold such important statements that would have otherwise cleared his client,and unburden the family who was bankrolling his expense defense to get justice.The damage"is done"no matter when he is free from cps clutches and his wife the attorney asserts during media interview.The children are perhaps permanently scarred,for three years lost without their parents.
The parents life will be scarred,even at one time attorney asserts they referring to CPS worker did make the mother "piss in a cup"completely humiliating this innocent woman,
even when she has NO HISTORY of even drinking let alone hard core marijuana,drug use.The embarrassment,abuse of CPS power is what these innocent parents who are innocent MUST endure as their children,all for what? why?As the attorney concludes his interview saying no amount of money can change the corruption in this case but they shall of coruse win something back for the abuse of power BY CPS causing the kids and the innocent parent such heartache and repeated abuse by this troubling agency. 

Footnote:

this case above,the state did NOT pursue a new trial.

Experts assert because of the length,the time and money would be wasted realizing cps efforts can rather  can go towards" children being"really" abused"in pennsylvania and not bring the defendant back to trial is a smart move,also the state in this case did settle after a yr and four months for  legal fees,the child and parent suffering being apart for almost 3 years, as well to this family who has spent over $65,000 in cash,mortgaging even their parent house in colorado and new jersey to pay back the parents in full.
The state did not even apologize but has admitted in  "past hearings"transcripts do reveal twice after the re-opening on appeal the 1st time they did make "mistakes"by not investigating "fully"and not allowing the defendant to have a "fair trial"thus,experts who viewed this case being mention above on this homepage above realize they would have LOST.
The state clearly now realizes this.
also,as in our advocate, ms.melendez case  out of union county,just recently back in court:
DYFS never told mother"children are in danger"child was"being hospitalized from serious BODILY/psychological injuries just lied under OATH claiming she is doing well in dad care a ex addict.MOTHER WAS NOT ALLOWED To visit her sick/near death feasibly child who doc say tried to KILL/commit suicide,repeatedly & other serious injuries,psychiatric breakdown(S)and"would have"benefited IF maybe"her MOTHER was there by her child side,who clearly was SEVERELY INJURED in dyfs placement/dad/grandmother care.DYFS KEPT ALL OF THIS MOST IMPORTANT,material info on "child"health from court,and NOW?we clearly know why.

 

 

Father never himself, a ex convict,and serious former heroine addict for many years,himself also never disclose this to court through his lawyer saying no concerns,as child(ren)are better,doing well,agreeing with dyfs"kids are well"no concerns"but yet she was as DOCTOR has said was in VERY bad shape/hurt repeatedly while IN DAD/Grandma care since they actually receive custody ILLEGALLY,almost since day ONE...

THIS GOES TO THE Crux of the case as to"why"a father like that has NO BUSINESS being around these girls.

D.Y.F.S.only recently conceding this is all true,ONLY when forced"after mother FOUND all this disturbing heartbreaking truthful INFO on her daughter out from doc,

NOW DYFS is finally  conceding ALL mom saying is "true"about her daughter,but yet mother has not seen the actual"MEDICAL/SCHOOL"records"but predict this shall all be soon as we now await the judge decision to vacate this act of fraud created by DYFS OF UNION COUNTY,

Throwing OUT the substantiated decision,that was clearly a act of fraud,which included repeated acts of PERJURY BY all involved and union county dyfs.