One relatively common fact pattern in DYFS litigation is the case in which DYFS receives a complaint "allegation"they call it MOST LIES OVER 85% Here in NEW JERSEY FOR YEARS STATISTIC SHOW,
about neglect or abuse of children of parents who do not live together
and or are formally"married' in new jersey.
Sometimes the parents have come to their own agreement about custody but rarely......
Sometimes custody has been decided in another court not always the court where the children reside at,sometimes change of venue(s)are warranted,
as when the allegations are severe enough,
shall and usually more times then often,
removes the children from one parent and places them with the non-custodial parent and or a family member if available/"qualified"to take care of the son/daughters.
In such DYFS cases "after"the bogus allegation is once made the division youth family services here in new jersey more so then ever are "obtaining an order of protection from the NEW JERSEY Superior Court citing numerous at times "wrong"info about a child being in "imminent"risk, during the litigation, the parent has to participate in services designed to fix the problems that has arised in the first place to lead to the substantiated (IF PROVEN IN COURT BY FACTUAL AND CREDIBLE EVIDENCE,ALSO VERIFIABLE/VALIDATED EVIDENCE)
Those services shall and usually do include mental health counseling, parenting classes, drug programs if warranted to facilitate a speedy re-unification(parents having a fact finding concluding as OUR civil rights activist case,
seven/eight months AFTER REMOVAL is in NO WAY"speedy" and in "timely fashion)
DELAYING DISPOSITIONAL(without sufficient valid reason)
MORE SO WITHOUT A HEARING AS TO WHERE CHILD SHOULD BE PLACED AND OR RETURN HOME To the current primary parent, is NOT rapid,within a timely fashion,
as dyfs MUST and the court make it feasible for child to return home if not a FULL EVIDENTIARY hearing during the dispositional as mention in the:
D.Y.F.S V.G.M. dated in early 2008 and this is a great thing for PARENTAL RIGHT(s)victims
by DYFS OF NEW JERSEY.
across the courtrooms in new jersey UNION COUNTY and all other 21 counties in our state,the judge(s)are going to have to consider, and abide by,
rely on experts all say to NEW CASE law,and the constitutional right(s)of the parents regarding fair fundamental FAIRNESS,AND JUSTICE AS DISPOSITIONAL hearing is what gave our advocate,ms.melendez ex spouse a known JUNKIE/ALCOHOLIC,SERIOUS EX CON WITH DRUG convictions and paraphernalia arrest and serious heroine robber crimes FULL LEGAL SOLE CUSTODY and this was not suppose to happen and his OWN ATTORNEY knows
it from transcript proving this by ONE SPECIFIC statement he has stated,during 06 as we are heading back to cour this month or next during march/april and we shall get JUSTICE!
a man like KEVIN SPENCER WOULD HAVE NEVER EXPERTS ALL asser would have never during this dispos.hearing gotten custody,and HE KNOWS IT his not too "bright" Attorney from westfield mike magaril knows this and each and every other person following ILLEGAL WRONGFUL FRAUDULENT removal case knows this as all experts keep asserting to the mother our advocate here at G.M.F.D. and D.F.R.
IF NOT FOR THE GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE DURING THE WHOLE ENTIRE case but "more so" during the ILLEGAL fraudulent DISPOSITIONAL REVIEW in our advocate case just two years ago summer 05 and NOW it is time for the wrongs in our advocate case with the assistant of FRAUD WITHHELD PHOTO(s)and this case and of TEN(s)of others and withheld DYFS REPORT"clearing mother"to finally result in JUSTICE for the advocate beautiful girls and the mother.
so use this case study new jerseyans as this is a GREAT WIN IN DYFS VS.G.M.new law enacted as attorneys are quoting and use it in your case,correlate first to your case and then?
get your kids home!
remember our many supporter(s) this is a great thing
for parental rights and the children being held hostage/abscond/taken BY DYFS.
just like a fact finding trial shall commence
"before a CHANGE of custody"is permitted by "ALL"lower court trial judge(s) AND CORRUPT DYFS!!!
.
this is a great win for all of us and rest assured this shall help our advocate AND SO MANY
OTHER(s)innocent parents as the HIGHEST COURT Ruling is as is in D.Y.F.S. V.G.M.in 08 and make sure you compare this to YOUR current case as it fits PERFECTLY the numerous violations cited in our advocate case and shall help her win along with
F-R-A-U-D.
now, once the PARENT who has PRIMARY CUSTODY of this child even after"1"substanti.incident of non-aggravating circumstances as in our advocate case in nj;
Once the parent completes the services, the court THEN MUST DECIDE as to "whether or not the INTIAL prob has been taken care of and or eliminated altogether that has LED THE FAMILY into court in the first place so then the child SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO RETURN BACK TO HER/his home with HIS PARENT "AFTER"1 substantiated abuse incident/neglect occurred to the child(ren).
"saying well your honor we are going to just"work with dad"a KNOWN crackhead sewer gutter rat who is known for pushing shoping carts for HEROINE AND "WHATEVER ELSE"he did to get "money"FOR HEROINE judge and whose known for SHOOTIN'UP NEEDLE/SYRINGE/PARAPHERNALIA Convictions and did several months in prison/county jail judge for these reasons and other criminal acts,even though he has shack up with someone LIKE HIM WHOSE HERSELF ABUSING,admitting to drugs/alcohol judge on myspace.com
openly "IN FRONT"of a child"we will still"give custody/recommend CUSTODY FULL SOLE PERMANENT FOR this kind of "man"the dad.
all experts in this case involving OUR ADVOCATE said that was NOT suppose to happen even D.Y.F.S worker who calling mother is saying this and TTWO supervisory staff are coming clean conceding this FACT....
*
and G.M. SEALS that statement from expert(S)the same as ALL OTHER CASE LAW AND DYFS "Own"statutorily DUTY under all NEW JERSEY LAW!
after a parent is DONE WITH SERVICE(S)and ELIMINATE/CORRECT the "OWER then it HAS to be determine will it be safe/in the BEST INTEREST of "our children"to return back home a HEARING on all of this MUST BY N.J.statute/DYFS statutorily MUST hold a hearing on all of this and the lower court judge MUST abide as he himself is NOT LAW.
HE IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW,and this is NOT followed as in G.M. you SHALL WIN ON APPEAL AND it should not take EXTRA MONEY $ to go to higher court when the low
trial court judge should preclude by showing clear bias,by abusing his own discretion and ignoring the law!
problem is within DYFS knowingly what they are doing and is in CLEAR violation usually"wins"because NOT because they are "Caring"for our advocate girls or YOUR child but because they are jealous bitter NO TYPE OF GOOD AND REAL LIFE INHUMANE COLD HEARTEN DARKEN SOULS,who feel they are able to BREAK THE LAW BY KEEPING "OUR"CHILDREN without just cause and proper dispositional hearing(S)etc.
Unfortunately america and N.J. as we all are too familiar with and our advocate as you see is doing something about it.
What has been happening around the state is that DYFS has not been returning these children home even AFTER
they know you cannot UNDER N.J.LAW"KEEP A CHILD AWAY FROM THE "CHILD"HOME without a fair plenary evidentiary HEARING!(during the dispositional hearing everyone)
They have been dismissing the litigation based on simply fraud or getting"lazy"with their overburdening children caseload,lieing falsifying etc and rushing children"off"to foster care for bonuses/incentives as in our advocate case saying,
"well we can now leave the case judge"because the girls are in good care,safe place with a crackhead known heroine addict/ex con (kevin spencer)with a live in alcoholic named jennifer medford who herself has who housed RAPIST and drug heroine/cocaine/aggravated assault,manufacturer/distrib. a KNOWN child molesting rapist convict named james spradley & a man named donald jones in plainfield nj.
THESE ARE WHO DYFS FEELS ARE SUCH GOOD LOVING AND"FIT"
CARING PARENTS/MEN/WOMEN to be around our advocate kid?
this case law featured on this webpage D.Y.F.S. VS. G.M just handed down by the HIGHER COURT APPELLATE DIVISION shall assist our advocate and many more win back the RIGHT TO BRING the girls home finally and where they belong!
as the evidence used in the actual dispositional/evidentiary hearing shall be and must be considered weighed for probative value,witness(es)shall be called etc,veifying DOCUMENT(s)from obstensible putative so called"expert and or social workers" BEFORE CUSTODY IS ALTERED!
(just about the same as you are having a fact finding)
no more of DYFS SAYING AND DOING WHAT THEY Want to innocent parents and switching custody based on WRONG AND baseless "1"simple little substantiated incident in the house with mom/dad etc. this case is a GREAT CASE which is why it is being featured on it's own webpage,everyone!
it is not fair dyfs is able(well up until now with this great case law just handed down early 08,NOT FAIR to say,well we are off the case now and child is safe without conducting proper background/without making certain children are going to be"ok"and or not alright to keep children out of home by falsifying document as in our administrator/owner/advocate/author case,
sha'kaarii melendez then say by the way judge,
"let us present more litigation for her"running her bills up so much more tens and thousands of bucks a pop month to month EVEN THOUGH we know she is innocent and know we are breaking the law your honor.
now,
based on this case study/new rule implicit in this D.Y.F.S. VS.G.M. out of new jersey ALL HAS CHANGED AND THIS CAN BE USED IN ALL OF OUR CASE(s)and shall assist many including our ADVOCATE
get JUSTICE AND HER GIRLS AWAY FROM A Man whose damaage his and her girls profusely and
used CRIMINAL ACTIVITY,
FRAUD DOCTORED/ALTERED Submission of fake documents and or altered document withheld evidence as DYFS ALL IN THE NAME OF GETTING"HER GIRLS"out of HER HOME WHO WERE CLEARLY NOT ABUSED....
A parent who diligently completes counseling or drug rehab in the expectation that their children will come home all over new jersey
but they don’t get their children back because of DYFS FRAUD and breaking the law,UNTIL D.Y.F.S. V.GM and other case laws in N.J. and nationwide and our advocate case SOON TO BE WON!
A parent does everything that DYFS and the court ask, but does not get their children back,so now:
what is wrong new jersey and amercia with THIS picture?"
but thanks to DYFS VS G.M.as of early 08?
Not any more!
The Appellate Division happily and legally announced just this early 08 in new jersey appellate court, this decision a new rule has been mentioned in here as well attorney(s)are confirming,experts to our advocate,as "dispositioinal hearing"shall have a full custody/plenary/evidentiary hearing first to decide on and or consider a change of custody as without?
can leave DEVASTATING RESULT for the child being"kept from"removed from the home they are so used of living in.
As this is EXACTLY what sadly has happen to our advocate beautiful"once sane'girls,but now there is hope even MORE hope beside the"discovery of NO ABUSE"to her little girl from the police department,newly discovered by her and her attorney former D.A.G.johnathan gordon...
The parent is entitled to a full, evidentiary hearing before a child protective case is dismissed with
a change in original custody arrangement.
